Malvika Herbopharma Pvt Ltd vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS, ,GP OS,GP OS — HCBM20123312026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Section19. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020123312026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/12331/2026
Filing Date
07-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malvika Herbopharma Pvt Ltd
Adv. Agam
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS, ,GP OS,GP OS
Deputy Collector Land Acquisition
Adv. GP OS
Salehath Faizul Aam Wakf Trust
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 11-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Malvika Herbopharma Pvt Ltd against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court directed that an affidavit of service for respondent No.3 be filed within one week and listed the petition for further consideration on 11th June 2026 to allow respondent No.3 to appear. The court noted a possibility of compensation disbursement before the next hearing and reserved liberty for the petitioner to mention before the vacation court in case of urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Malvika Herbopharma Pvt Ltd against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court directed that an affidavit of service for respondent No.3 be filed within one week and listed the petition for further consideration on 11th June 2026 to allow respondent No.3 to appear. The court noted a possibility of compensation disbursement before the next hearing and reserved liberty for the petitioner to mention before the vacation court in case of urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts