NERGISH IRANI vs AJAYKUMAR GARG — HCBM20122702026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020122702026
Filing Number
IA/12270/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NERGISH IRANI
Adv. Jayakar and Partners
-
2.ROSHAN HOSHI GAZDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYKUMAR GARG
-
2.SHYAMSUNDAR AGARWAL
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Case Summary Nergish Irani & Roshan Hoshi Gazdar v. Ajaykumar Garg & Shyamsundar Agarwal The Bombay High Court allowed the interim application with conditions. Tenants challenging a 1998 conveyance deed for "Gazdar House" at Warden Road were permitted to carry out minimal tenantable repairs, subject to strict limitations: no structural changes, work restricted to specified hours, completion within six months, architect certification required, and the order remains a temporary pro tem arrangement conferring no rights on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Production At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Production At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Case Summary Nergish Irani & Roshan Hoshi Gazdar v. Ajaykumar Garg & Shyamsundar Agarwal The Bombay High Court allowed the interim application with conditions. Tenants challenging a 1998 conveyance deed for "Gazdar House" at Warden Road were permitted to carry out minimal tenantable repairs, subject to strict limitations: no structural changes, work restricted to specified hours, completion within six months, architect certification required, and the order remains a temporary pro tem arrangement conferring no rights on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts