Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd NaIK NAIK AND COMPANY vs Jovan Martins Advocate - SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES — HCBM20122582026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020122582026
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
06-04-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/12258/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Interim Relief ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd NaIK NAIK AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
Jovan Martins Advocate - SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9
ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 04-05-2026 | ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9 |
| 07-05-2026 | ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9 |
Orders
Case Summary Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd v. Jovan Martins – Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 12258 of 2026, Bombay High Court (07 May 2026) The petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was allowed and disposed of. The parties mutually agreed to domestic ad hoc arbitration instead of Singapore International Arbitration Centre proceedings. Justice S.V. Gangapurwala (Former Chief Justice of Madras High Court) was appointed as Ad hoc Arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from employment and shareholders agreements dated 17 May 2022. Arbitration fees shall be shared equally by parties, subject to final award. All contentions on merits remain open before the Arbitral Tribunal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd v. Jovan Martins – Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 12258 of 2026, Bombay High Court (07 May 2026) The petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was allowed and disposed of. The parties mutually agreed to domestic ad hoc arbitration instead of Singapore International Arbitration Centre proceedings. Justice S.V. Gangapurwala (Former Chief Justice of Madras High Court) was appointed as Ad hoc Arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from employment and shareholders agreements dated 17 May 2022. Arbitration fees shall be shared equally by parties, subject to final award. All contentions on merits remain open before the Arbitral Tribunal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts