Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd NaIK NAIK AND COMPANY vs Jovan Martins Advocate - SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES — HCBM20122582026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM020122582026

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/12258/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd NaIK NAIK AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

Jovan Martins Advocate - SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

29-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

04-05-2026

ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9

07-05-2026

ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Case Summary Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd v. Jovan Martins – Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 12258 of 2026, Bombay High Court (07 May 2026) The petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was allowed and disposed of. The parties mutually agreed to domestic ad hoc arbitration instead of Singapore International Arbitration Centre proceedings. Justice S.V. Gangapurwala (Former Chief Justice of Madras High Court) was appointed as Ad hoc Arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from employment and shareholders agreements dated 17 May 2022. Arbitration fees shall be shared equally by parties, subject to final award. All contentions on merits remain open before the Arbitral Tribunal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Collective Artists Network India Pvt Ltd v. Jovan Martins – Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 12258 of 2026, Bombay High Court (07 May 2026) The petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was allowed and disposed of. The parties mutually agreed to domestic ad hoc arbitration instead of Singapore International Arbitration Centre proceedings. Justice S.V. Gangapurwala (Former Chief Justice of Madras High Court) was appointed as Ad hoc Arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from employment and shareholders agreements dated 17 May 2022. Arbitration fees shall be shared equally by parties, subject to final award. All contentions on merits remain open before the Arbitral Tribunal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case