SALMA MD. RAFIQ SAYYED WIFE OF MD RAFIQ CHAND SAYYED(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO vs APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE (AGRC) — WP/1932/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020122282026

Filing Number

WP/12228/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/1932/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMA MD. RAFIQ SAYYED WIFE OF MD RAFIQ CHAND SAYYED(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  2. 2.RAMJI SAWANT(ANNEXURE NO

  3. 3.FAROOQUE YUNUS SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

  4. 4.MAIMUNABI MEHMOOD MOMIN(ANNEXURE NO

  5. 5.SHAIKH SHABANA(ANNEXURE NO

  6. 6.WASIM AHMED HUSSAIN S/O AHMED HUSSAIN MD IBRAHIM(DECEASED) (ANNEXURE NO

  7. 7.MD RAUF HAKIMUDDIN S/O SK HAKIMUDDIN SUBRATI (DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  8. 8.MD HARRON YUSUF SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

  9. 9.RAJJAB ALI S/O MD SABIR SIDDIQUI(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  10. 10.MD IRFAN ATTAR S/O MD HUSSAIN DADAMIYA(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  11. 11.ADAM MUSA SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

  12. 12.ARBAAZ MEHBOOB SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

  13. 13.MD AAMEEN AKHTAR ALI GRANDSON OF SABIRA KHALID RAZA ANSARI(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  14. 14.GUNAJI BHIKU GAMRE(ANNEXURE NO

  15. 15.BHAGWAN DEVJI KAMBLE(ANNEXURE NO

  16. 16.ANUSAYA ARJUN TAMBE(ANNEXURE NO

  17. 17.RAVI SAKHARAM MERCHANDE(ANNEXURE NO

  18. 18.AMINA SYED YUSUF D/O SYED YUSUF ALI(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  19. 19.MD JAVED ABBAS SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

  20. 20.SHAKIL AHMED(ANNEXURE NO

  21. 21.RAZIYA BEGUM W/O NOOR MOHAMMED SK(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  22. 22.SHAQIF SALIM INAMDAR S/O SALIM USMAN INAMDAR(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  23. 23.RAFIQ SAFI ANSARI S/O SAIBUNNISA SAFI AHMED(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  24. 24.NORODDIN ANSARI S/O MD SABIR ANSARI(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  25. 25.IBRAHIM MANSURI(ANNEXURE NO

  26. 26.SHAIKH IBRAHIM(ANNEXURE NO

  27. 27.SHARAFAT HUSSAIN ABDUL HAMID(ANNEXURE NO

  28. 28.SK AHMED SK IMAM S/O MEHBOOB BI SHAIKH(DECEASED)(ANNEXURE NO

  29. 29.SAIRA SABIR FAKIH(ANNEXURE NO

  30. 30.SHARIF SHAFIQ AHMED LEGAL HEIRS OF BARKATUNNISA SHAFIQ (ANNEXURE NO

  31. 31.RESHMA PARVEZ ANSARI(ANNEXURE NO

  32. 32.REHANA BEGUM ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH(ANNEXURE NO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE (AGRC)

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR SPECIAL CELL WESTERN SUBURBS SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

  3. 3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(SRA)

  4. 4.M/S FOREMOST REALTORS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

    Adv. Vis Juris

  5. 5.THE VICE PRESIDENT CEO MHADA MUMBAI BOARD

  6. 6.BHARAT EKTA CO OPERATIVE HO(NIYOJIT)

  7. 7.ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY MANTRALAYA MUMBAI

  8. 8.ESTATE MANAGER MHADA MUMBAI BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Salma Md. Rafiq Sayyed and others, declining to grant relief because an earlier writ petition (No. 5438 of 2026) concerning the same petitioner and structure had been dismissed by the court. The court directed the petitioners to file an appropriate application in the earlier petition if they wished to seek the reliefs claimed herein, as the proceedings before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) were closed for orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    At 11.00 A.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1932/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Salma Md. Rafiq Sayyed and others, declining to grant relief because an earlier writ petition (No. 5438 of 2026) concerning the same petitioner and structure had been dismissed by the court. The court directed the petitioners to file an appropriate application in the earlier petition if they wished to seek the reliefs claimed herein, as the proceedings before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) were closed for orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case