YUSUF DAWOODBHAI BRACKETWALA (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT) vs MAHENDRA V.SHAH — HCBM20122112026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020122112026

Filing Number

TPAC/12211/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Coram

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUSUF DAWOODBHAI BRACKETWALA (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT)

    Adv. Sujit Lahoti and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA V.SHAH

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed third party applicant Yusuf Dawoodbhai Bracketwala's application to obtain a certified copy of the Order dated 10.07.2001 from Writ Petition No. 973/2000. The applicant, a tenant in property acquired by MHADA, requires this certified copy to defend against an eviction suit (RAE Suit No. 845/2009) filed by the landlord company, arguing the property's acquisition extinguished the landlord's rights. The court found sufficient cause and directed issuance of the certified copy upon payment of charges, restricting its use to the stated purpose only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed third party applicant Yusuf Dawoodbhai Bracketwala's application to obtain a certified copy of the Order dated 10.07.2001 from Writ Petition No. 973/2000. The applicant, a tenant in property acquired by MHADA, requires this certified copy to defend against an eviction suit (RAE Suit No. 845/2009) filed by the landlord company, arguing the property's acquisition extinguished the landlord's rights. The court found sufficient cause and directed issuance of the certified copy upon payment of charges, restricting its use to the stated purpose only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case