YUSUF DAWOODBHAI BRACKETWALA (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT) vs MAHENDRA V.SHAH — HCBM20122112026
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020122112026
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
TPAC/12211/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YUSUF DAWOODBHAI BRACKETWALA (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT)
Adv. Sujit Lahoti and Associates
Respondent(s)
MAHENDRA V.SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed third party applicant Yusuf Dawoodbhai Bracketwala's application to obtain a certified copy of the Order dated 10.07.2001 from Writ Petition No. 973/2000. The applicant, a tenant in property acquired by MHADA, requires this certified copy to defend against an eviction suit (RAE Suit No. 845/2009) filed by the landlord company, arguing the property's acquisition extinguished the landlord's rights. The court found sufficient cause and directed issuance of the certified copy upon payment of charges, restricting its use to the stated purpose only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed third party applicant Yusuf Dawoodbhai Bracketwala's application to obtain a certified copy of the Order dated 10.07.2001 from Writ Petition No. 973/2000. The applicant, a tenant in property acquired by MHADA, requires this certified copy to defend against an eviction suit (RAE Suit No. 845/2009) filed by the landlord company, arguing the property's acquisition extinguished the landlord's rights. The court found sufficient cause and directed issuance of the certified copy upon payment of charges, restricting its use to the stated purpose only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts