SUDHIR S. CHAUDHARY vs SHIVKANT V. CHAUDHARY — IA/2210/2026

Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020120312026

Filing Number

IA/12031/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/2210/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPANY LAW, MRTP AND ALLIED ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR S. CHAUDHARY

    Adv. Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVKANT V. CHAUDHARY

  2. 2.GEETA S CHAUDHARY W/O SHIVKANT CHAUDHARY

  3. 3.SEEMA MENON

  4. 4.DINESH CHANDRA MAINGI (ORG. PETITIONER)

  5. 5.THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND THE LIQUIDATOR OF GEETA MARINE SERVICES P. LTD. (COMPLAINANT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/2210/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Sudhir S. Chaudhary's interim application to withdraw Rs. 1,00,000 deposited as security when he was granted permission to travel abroad in 2022. The applicant's acquittal on October 1, 2025, in the underlying complaint removed the necessity for the security deposit. The Official Liquidator had no objections, and the court ordered the Prothonotary to release the full amount plus accrued interest to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/2210/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Sudhir S. Chaudhary's interim application to withdraw Rs. 1,00,000 deposited as security when he was granted permission to travel abroad in 2022. The applicant's acquittal on October 1, 2025, in the underlying complaint removed the necessity for the security deposit. The Official Liquidator had no objections, and the court ordered the Prothonotary to release the full amount plus accrued interest to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case