MITESH ILESH GADHIA vs ILESH AMRUTLAL GADHIA — TP/2534/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020120212026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/12021/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2534/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITESH ILESH GADHIA

    Adv. B G Saraf

  2. 2.KRISHNA ILESH GADHIA

    Adv. SARAF BHALCHANDRA GOVIND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ILESH AMRUTLAL GADHIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2534/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Mitesh Ilesh Gadhia and Krishna Ilesh Gadhia against Ilesh Amrutlal Gadhia and issued directions for procedural compliance. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and required the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The case was adjourned pending completion of all procedural requirements, with liberty to list the matter for final hearing once compliance is demonstrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2534/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Mitesh Ilesh Gadhia and Krishna Ilesh Gadhia against Ilesh Amrutlal Gadhia and issued directions for procedural compliance. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and required the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The case was adjourned pending completion of all procedural requirements, with liberty to list the matter for final hearing once compliance is demonstrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case