Dr Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil vs Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay through its Director Advocate - M V KINI AND CO — HCBM20120002026

Case under Patents Act Section 15. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020120002026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

COMMP/12000/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PATENTS ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Patents Act Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil

    Adv. Ravindra Chile

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay through its Director Advocate - M V KINI AND CO

  2. 2.Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks

  3. 3.Prof Siddhartha Prakash Duttagupta

  4. 4.Ramesh Pushpagandha

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed the Interim Application seeking condonation of a 164-day delay in filing the petition by Dr. Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil against IIT Bombay. The court found sufficient cause to condone the delay as it was not inordinate and posed no prejudice to the respondent. The respondent was granted three weeks to file a reply, with rejoinder due within three weeks thereafter, and the matter shall proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed the Interim Application seeking condonation of a 164-day delay in filing the petition by Dr. Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil against IIT Bombay. The court found sufficient cause to condone the delay as it was not inordinate and posed no prejudice to the respondent. The respondent was granted three weeks to file a reply, with rejoinder due within three weeks thereafter, and the matter shall proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case