Dr Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil vs Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay through its Director Advocate - M V KINI AND CO — HCBM20120002026
Case under Patents Act Section 15. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020120002026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2026
Filing Number
COMMP/12000/2026
Filing Date
04-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Bench Type
Single
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PATENTS ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dr Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil
Adv. Ravindra Chile
Respondent(s)
Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay through its Director Advocate - M V KINI AND CO
Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks
Prof Siddhartha Prakash Duttagupta
Ramesh Pushpagandha
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
FOR DIRECTION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 22-04-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 17-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed the Interim Application seeking condonation of a 164-day delay in filing the petition by Dr. Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil against IIT Bombay. The court found sufficient cause to condone the delay as it was not inordinate and posed no prejudice to the respondent. The respondent was granted three weeks to file a reply, with rejoinder due within three weeks thereafter, and the matter shall proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed the Interim Application seeking condonation of a 164-day delay in filing the petition by Dr. Tarkeshwar Chandrakant Patil against IIT Bombay. The court found sufficient cause to condone the delay as it was not inordinate and posed no prejudice to the respondent. The respondent was granted three weeks to file a reply, with rejoinder due within three weeks thereafter, and the matter shall proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts