SANTOSH GAURISHANKAR KANOJIA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER — HCBM20119722025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020119722025

Filing Number

WP/11972/2025

Filing Date

17-Apr-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH GAURISHANKAR KANOJIA

    Adv. DHARAM AND CO

  2. 2.MANORAMA SUNIL PARDESI

  3. 3.SWAMI SAIRAM ANMOLU

  4. 4.SAYVVA SAIRAM ANMOLU

  5. 5.LAXMI POSHNNA PUNNA

  6. 6.SAIRAM POSHNNA PUNNA

  7. 7.UDYARAJ BARFILALA KANOJIA

  8. 8.AALEKHKUMAR ASRFILALA KANOJIA

  9. 9.SUSHILA LALJI KANOJIA

  10. 10.AMAN LALJI KANOJIA

  11. 11.PAPPULAL MAIKULAL KANOJIA

  12. 12.JITENDRA SHRIRAM KANAUJIYA

  13. 13.SURYAKUMAR G. KANOJIYA

  14. 14.BABU POSHYYA PUNNA

  15. 15.SATTA GANGADHAR GAGARAM

  16. 16.GANESH GANGARAM SATTA

  17. 17.MAMTA BHUMESH KONAPLI

  18. 18.BHUMESH GANGARAM KONAPLLI

  19. 19.NARESH GANGARAM KONAPLLI

  20. 20.PANNALAL GHRBHRI KANOJIA

  21. 21.MADANLAL GHRBHRI KANOJIA

  22. 22.HARISH SAYANNA KPMANPALLI

  23. 23.NARESH SAYANNA KOMANPALLY

  24. 24.RAMANUJ RAMACHHEBR KANOJIA

  25. 25.AASHA MITHAILALA KANOJIA

  26. 26.JITENDRA VISHRAM WAGHELA

  27. 27.SARLABEN SHANTILAL VAZA

  28. 28.SURESH V. WAGHELA

  29. 29.ASHOK RAVJI CHUDASAMA

  30. 30.SHILESH CHHAGANLAL CHUDASAMA

  31. 31.SHANTILAL PURSHOTAM

  32. 32.PRAVIN PURUSHOTAM WAZA

  33. 33.HIRAL NAVIN VARA

  34. 34.NARSAYYA ASANNA KALLURI

  35. 35.M. PADMA PAPANNA

  36. 36.PAPANNA POSHANNA

  37. 37.PADMA SANJIVAYYA ANCHINURI

  38. 38.M. VYANKATESH PAPANNA

  39. 39.DHUMARI SHARDA PARSHARAMLU

  40. 40.BHIMANA M. LAXMINARAYAN

  41. 41.KOMRNNA RAMYYA BASPRAJU

  42. 42.MAHENDRA BABU CHUDASAMA

  43. 43.RAMESH SAYYANA KALLURI

  44. 44.ASHOK SAYYANA KALLURI

  45. 45.SATTA GANEH GANGARAM

  46. 46.KAVITA GANESH SATTA

  47. 47.JAMUNA ASHOK LIGAMPELLI

  48. 48.ANCHANURI BAGAVVA, W/O BALANNA ENKANNA

  49. 49.KIRTI TRIKAMLAL CHAVAN

  50. 50.DHOBI KALYAN AND AUDHYOGIC VIKAS CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, A STATUTORY CORPORATION

  3. 3.ASST. ENGINEER (MAINTENANCE) G-/SOUTH

  4. 4.PIRAMAL REALTY

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition (L) No. 11972/2025 filed by Santosh Gaurishankar Kanojia, Manorama Sunil Pardesi, and Swami Sairam Anmolu against the State of Maharashtra and others was adjourned. The Bombay High Court granted a final extension till 03.07.2026 for petitioners to remove office objections and get the petition registered, with warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  5. 17-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition (L) No. 11972/2025 filed by Santosh Gaurishankar Kanojia, Manorama Sunil Pardesi, and Swami Sairam Anmolu against the State of Maharashtra and others was adjourned. The Bombay High Court granted a final extension till 03.07.2026 for petitioners to remove office objections and get the petition registered, with warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case