MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI PVT LTD AND 2 ORS vs AJAY HARINATH SINGH AND 15 ORS Advocate - Rajesh Harishankar Singh , DEFENDANT NO. 14,Bhupendra Singh,DEFENDANT NO.14,M/S. APEX LAW PARTNERS,DEFENDANT NO. 13,ANUP KHAITAN AND COMPANY,DEFENDANT NO. 12,-,VISHAL KOLEKAR,RANDHIR KALE,SHUBHAM KADAM,HARSHAVARDHAN PATIL,- — S/412/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020119662015
Filing Number
S/414/2015
Filing Date
24-Apr-2015
Registration No
S/412/2015
Registration Date
25-May-2015
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI PVT LTD AND 2 ORS
Adv. Mahimtura and Company
-
2.RAJESH RAJENDRAKUMAR SHETH AND SANJAY @ SANJESH RAJENDRAKUMAR SHETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAY HARINATH SINGH AND 15 ORS Advocate - Rajesh Harishankar Singh , DEFENDANT NO. 14,Bhupendra Singh,DEFENDANT NO.14,M/S. APEX LAW PARTNERS,DEFENDANT NO. 13,ANUP KHAITAN AND COMPANY,DEFENDANT NO. 12,-,VISHAL KOLEKAR,RANDHIR KALE,SHUBHAM KADAM,HARSHAVARDHAN PATIL,-
-
2.DARWIN PLATFORM INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Adv. VISHAL KOLEKAR,HARSHAVARDHAN PATIL SHUBHAM KADAM RANDHIR KALE
-
3.DARWIN PLATFORM REALTY LIMITED
Adv. VISHAL KOLEKAR,HARSHAVARDHAN PATIL SHUBHAM KADAM RANDHIR KALE
-
4.KAMLAKAR LAXMAN PATIL
-
5.MOHAMMADSALIM HARUNSIDDIK LAKHANI
-
6.AJAY MADAN VARMA
-
7.WAMAN DEVBA DETHE
-
8.FATMABI ANSARE
-
9.VIJAYA PATIL
-
10.RAMJI PANDEY
-
11.MUGLIKAR ASHUTOSH AVINASH
-
12.ROHAN LALIT JAIN
-
13.MIOTESH VIJAY GOGRI
-
14.MUDHRA CONSUMER SERVICES
-
15.REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Adv. D P SINGH
-
16.REEMA RAJENDRAKUMAR SHETH
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Specially Assigned Matters - Part Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court found that a Form DIR-12 (Exhibit P/51) filed by the plaintiffs in December 2014 was fabricated, as it purported to show a director's resignation in 2007 despite being filed after his death in April 2010. Regarding allegations of forged signatures on other documents, the court appointed Helik Advisory Limited as a handwriting expert to examine and report on the authenticity of signatures of Rajendrakumar Maneklal Sheth, Sanjay Sheth, and Rajesh Sheth within four weeks, with costs to be borne by the plaintiffs. The case is listed for June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Part-Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
26-Mar-2026
Specially Assigned Matters- Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
04-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
22-Mar-2019
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
22-Mar-2019
For Written Statement
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
23-Jan-2019
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
23-Jan-2019
For Written Statement
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
25-Oct-2018
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
25-Oct-2018
For Direction
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
22-Aug-2017
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
22-Aug-2017
For Direction
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master
-
13-Oct-2015
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. S/412/2015
Summary: The Bombay High Court found that a Form DIR-12 (Exhibit P/51) filed by the plaintiffs in December 2014 was fabricated, as it purported to show a director's resignation in 2007 despite being filed after his death in April 2010. Regarding allegations of forged signatures on other documents, the court appointed Helik Advisory Limited as a handwriting expert to examine and report on the authenticity of signatures of Rajendrakumar Maneklal Sheth, Sanjay Sheth, and Rajesh Sheth within four weeks, with costs to be borne by the plaintiffs. The case is listed for June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts