METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED vs MITATRONICS — LPETN/138/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020119462026

Filing Number

LPETN/11946/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

LPETN/138/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MITATRONICS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    - Leave Petition -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPETN/138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case