METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED vs MITATRONICS — LPETN/138/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020119462026
Filing Number
LPETN/11946/2026
Filing Date
04-04-2026
Registration No
LPETN/138/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO
Respondent(s)
MITATRONICS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
- LEAVE PETITION -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | - LEAVE PETITION - |
Orders
Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts