METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED vs MITATRONICS — LPETN/138/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020119462026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

LPETN/11946/2026

Filing Date

04-04-2026

Registration No

LPETN/138/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

METAL POWER ANALYTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO

Respondent(s)

MITATRONICS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

17-04-2026

- LEAVE PETITION -

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LPETN/138/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Metal Power Analytical Pvt. Ltd.'s petition for leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1886, allowing it to file a suit against Mitatronics for damages arising from defective PCBA (printed circuit board assembly) supplies. Although the respondent was situated outside the court's jurisdiction, the court found that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within Mumbai, with effects felt both within and outside the jurisdiction due to customers in multiple locations purchasing the defective goods, thereby establishing sufficient nexus for jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case