SANJAY SHAHBLE vs ESTATE OFFICER DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ESTATE NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY Advocate - R P OJHA, ,R P OJHA,R P OJHA — HCBM20119422025
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020119422025
Filing Number
WP/11942/2025
Filing Date
17-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY SHAHBLE
Adv. SAMUKHRAO SUBHASH RAJARAM
-
2.AJAY SHAHBLE
-
3.SANJAY SHAHBLE
-
4.JYOTI SURESH JADHAV
-
5.NAMDEV PATIL
-
6.VILASINI VILAS REDKAR
-
7.MILIND ARJUN MOHITE
-
8.CHHAYA BABU YELVE
-
9.VINOD SONU PAWAR
-
10.SARASWATI BAMNE
-
11.ASHWINI SUNIL PAWAR
-
12.SHUSHMA VISHWANATH MISHTRI
-
13.AJMTUN NISHA
-
14.ZENIFAR MASKARE
-
15.VILAS NARAYAN DHOTRE
-
16.CHANDRAKANT SONAWANE
-
17.VIKRAM BALU SONAWANE
-
18.JITENDRA R. JAGTAP
-
19.KUSUMBAI R. JAGTAP
-
20.MAHENDRA C. JADHAV
-
21.SURESH HARI HATE
-
22.NITIN J TAMBE
-
23.SACHIN DAS DUPTE
-
24.INDUMATI SHIRKE
-
25.KALPANA SURESH NAGRARE
-
26.SNEHA SAKPAL
-
27.DEEPAK BABAJI MOHITE
-
28.SUNITA YELVE
-
29.SATYAVIJAY KRUSHNA SHINDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.ESTATE OFFICER DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ESTATE NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY Advocate - R P OJHA, ,R P OJHA,R P OJHA
-
2.WESTERN RAILWAY
Adv. R P OJHA
-
3.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI
-
4.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY TH. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
5.MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
This document does not contain a specific case decision regarding the petitioners named (Sanjay Shahble and Ajay Shahble). Rather, it is a administrative order from the Bombay High Court's Prothonotary listing 62 petitions (WPL cases from 2025) that are being rejected or require compliance. The order gives petitioners a final four-week deadline to remove office objections and file compliance documents, failing which the petitions will be rejected under O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Sep-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
14-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
23-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2025
Case filed
This document does not contain a specific case decision regarding the petitioners named (Sanjay Shahble and Ajay Shahble). Rather, it is a administrative order from the Bombay High Court's Prothonotary listing 62 petitions (WPL cases from 2025) that are being rejected or require compliance. The order gives petitioners a final four-week deadline to remove office objections and file compliance documents, failing which the petitions will be rejected under O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts