Originet Technologies Limited vs Union of India Advocate - SUMAN DAS — WP/1656/2025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020119042025
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
WP/11904/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
WP/1656/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Originet Technologies Limited
Adv. Brijesh Pathak
Respondent(s)
Union of India Advocate - SUMAN DAS
Additional Director DGGI
Adv. SUMAN DAS
Additional Commissioner CGST
Adv. SUMAN DAS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Summary of Case WP/1656/2025 Case: Originet Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Others Court: Bombay High Court (as part of a consolidated batch of petitions) Key Issue: Whether consolidated/multi-year show-cause notices can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 Order: Petitions referred to Larger Bench - The case was not decided on merits. Instead, the Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court judgments on this fundamental question and referred five critical questions of law to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination, including: 1. Whether limitation provisions in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict consolidated notice issuance 2. Whether consolidated notices for multiple years are permissible 3. The effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether the *Milroc* decision correctly interprets the law 5. The legal effect of the Supreme Court's dismissal in *Mathur Polymers* Status: Interim relief previously granted continues until the Larger Bench decides. The petitioner's consolidated show-cause notice challenging remains pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case WP/1656/2025 Case: Originet Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Others Court: Bombay High Court (as part of a consolidated batch of petitions) Key Issue: Whether consolidated/multi-year show-cause notices can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 Order: Petitions referred to Larger Bench - The case was not decided on merits. Instead, the Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court judgments on this fundamental question and referred five critical questions of law to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination, including: 1. Whether limitation provisions in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict consolidated notice issuance 2. Whether consolidated notices for multiple years are permissible 3. The effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether the *Milroc* decision correctly interprets the law 5. The legal effect of the Supreme Court's dismissal in *Mathur Polymers* Status: Interim relief previously granted continues until the Larger Bench decides. The petitioner's consolidated show-cause notice challenging remains pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts