Originet Technologies Limited vs Union of India Advocate - SUMAN DAS — WP/1656/2025

Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM020119042025

Next Hearing

29th July 2026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2025

Filing Number

WP/11904/2025

Filing Date

16-04-2025

Registration No

WP/1656/2025

Registration Date

03-05-2025

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74

Petitioner(s)

Originet Technologies Limited

Adv. Brijesh Pathak

Respondent(s)

Union of India Advocate - SUMAN DAS

Additional Director DGGI

Adv. SUMAN DAS

Additional Commissioner CGST

Adv. SUMAN DAS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

29-07-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

Summary of Case WP/1656/2025 Case: Originet Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Others Court: Bombay High Court (as part of a consolidated batch of petitions) Key Issue: Whether consolidated/multi-year show-cause notices can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 Order: Petitions referred to Larger Bench - The case was not decided on merits. Instead, the Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court judgments on this fundamental question and referred five critical questions of law to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination, including: 1. Whether limitation provisions in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict consolidated notice issuance 2. Whether consolidated notices for multiple years are permissible 3. The effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether the *Milroc* decision correctly interprets the law 5. The legal effect of the Supreme Court's dismissal in *Mathur Polymers* Status: Interim relief previously granted continues until the Larger Bench decides. The petitioner's consolidated show-cause notice challenging remains pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case WP/1656/2025 Case: Originet Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Others Court: Bombay High Court (as part of a consolidated batch of petitions) Key Issue: Whether consolidated/multi-year show-cause notices can be issued under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 Order: Petitions referred to Larger Bench - The case was not decided on merits. Instead, the Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court judgments on this fundamental question and referred five critical questions of law to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination, including: 1. Whether limitation provisions in Section 73(10)/74(10) restrict consolidated notice issuance 2. Whether consolidated notices for multiple years are permissible 3. The effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether the *Milroc* decision correctly interprets the law 5. The legal effect of the Supreme Court's dismissal in *Mathur Polymers* Status: Interim relief previously granted continues until the Larger Bench decides. The petitioner's consolidated show-cause notice challenging remains pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case