The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 Pune vs Late Subhash Shankar Waingankar through Legal Heir Shri Rushikesh Subhash Waingankar CO 11 — HCBM20118982025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020118982025

e-Filing Number

15-04-2025

Filing Number

ITXA/11898/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 Pune

    Adv. ARJUN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Late Subhash Shankar Waingankar through Legal Heir Shri Rushikesh Subhash Waingankar CO 11

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The High Court of Bombay issued a directive on 45 income tax appeals (including the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Late Subhash Shankar Waingankar case) scheduled for rejection. Appellants were given a final two-week deadline to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of appeals under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay issued a directive on 45 income tax appeals (including the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Late Subhash Shankar Waingankar case) scheduled for rejection. Appellants were given a final two-week deadline to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of appeals under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case