Chandrabala Purshottam Kapadia vs Manorama Purshottam Kapadia — TP/2040/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020117692026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/11769/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2040/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrabala Purshottam Kapadia

    Adv. Dhara Sangani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manorama Purshottam Kapadia

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2040/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for direction on 23rd April 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, and furnish an Administration Bond as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2040/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2040/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for direction on 23rd April 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, and furnish an Administration Bond as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case