HDFC BANK LIMITED. MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR, ,KISHOR CHALKE vs RAJESH GIRJASHANKAR PANDEY — EXA/899/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020117602023

Filing Number

EXA/11755/2023

Filing Date

25-Apr-2023

Registration No

EXA/899/2023

Registration Date

26-Jun-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED. MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR, ,KISHOR CHALKE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH GIRJASHANKAR PANDEY

  2. 2.POONAM RAJESH PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of previous proceedings excluded from limitation calculations, and allowed exceptions only if parties had express written agreements waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 25-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/899/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of previous proceedings excluded from limitation calculations, and allowed exceptions only if parties had express written agreements waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case