HARSHAL ENTERPRISES vs Saritagram Cooperative Housing Society Ltd — CARBP/430/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020117482026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/11748/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARBP/430/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSHAL ENTERPRISES

    Adv. AKSHAY R KAPADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saritagram Cooperative Housing Society Ltd

  2. 2.Yogeshwar Bajaj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted Harshal Enterprises' Section 9 interim relief petition against Respondent No.2 (Yogeshwar Bajaj), the sole dissenting member among 64 cooperative housing society members who had approved a redevelopment agreement. The court held that majority members' adoption of the redevelopment resolution binds individual members, and dissenting members cannot raise individual grievances in arbitration proceedings. The court directed Respondent No.2 to surrender flat keys by 30 April 2026, with police assistance authorized if necessary, while permitting him to execute an alternate accommodation agreement within 3 months or forfeit financial redevelopment benefits to be held in interest-bearing deposits by the society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/430/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Harshal Enterprises' Section 9 interim relief petition against Respondent No.2 (Yogeshwar Bajaj), the sole dissenting member among 64 cooperative housing society members who had approved a redevelopment agreement. The court held that majority members' adoption of the redevelopment resolution binds individual members, and dissenting members cannot raise individual grievances in arbitration proceedings. The court directed Respondent No.2 to surrender flat keys by 30 April 2026, with police assistance authorized if necessary, while permitting him to execute an alternate accommodation agreement within 3 months or forfeit financial redevelopment benefits to be held in interest-bearing deposits by the society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case