UNIVERSAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS THROUGH PARTNERS RAMESH SATRAMDAS BHAGIA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER — HCBM20117252025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020117252025

Filing Number

WP/11725/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNIVERSAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS THROUGH PARTNERS RAMESH SATRAMDAS BHAGIA

    Adv. ROSHAN SAWANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER

    Adv. ,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan,Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan 1123

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BUILDING AND FACTORY DEPT.

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (ZONE

  6. 6.RUBY AMIT SHARMA

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  7. 7.BINA VIPUL SHAH

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  8. 8.VIPUL B. SHAH

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  9. 9.PRADEEP JAGDISH GUPTA

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  10. 10.NEERJA PRADEEP GUPTA

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  11. 11.ADITYA PRADEEP GUPTA

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

  12. 12.VARUN PRADEEP GUPTA

    Adv. MAHAJAN AMEYA SUHAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in their petitions by filing compliance praecipes within four weeks from the order date; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This was a procedural order addressing technical filing deficiencies rather than substantive case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in their petitions by filing compliance praecipes within four weeks from the order date; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This was a procedural order addressing technical filing deficiencies rather than substantive case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case