Worldline ePayments India Private Limited SUJIT LAHOTI AND ASSOCIATES vs STATE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - Rathina Maravarman — COMS/45/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020117222025
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
COMS/11722/2025
Filing Date
15-Apr-2025
Registration No
COMS/45/2025
Registration Date
05-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
MONEY SUITS GENERAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Worldline ePayments India Private Limited SUJIT LAHOTI AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - Rathina Maravarman
-
2.HDFC BANK LIMITED
-
3.ICICI BANK LIMITED
-
4.AXIS BANK LTD
-
5.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
-
6.IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
-
7.AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD
Adv. Manan Sanghai
-
8.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
-
9.YES BANK LTD
Adv. TAMBAT VISHAL SHARAD
-
10.BANK OF BARODA
-
11.INDUSIND BANK LTD
Adv. PMH LAW
-
12.RBL BANK LTD
-
13.FEDERAL BANK LTD
Adv. MANGHNANI NARESH HARKISHINDAS,RAGHAVA M RUPA P S CHAUHAN ANVITA ALI
-
14.HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD
-
15.SBM BANK INDIA LTD
-
16.CANARA BANK
-
17.UNION BANK OF INDIA
-
18.SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD
-
19.STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
-
20.DBS BANK INDIA LTD
-
21.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD
-
22.CSB BANK LTD
-
23.LIVQUIK TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT LTD
Adv. Argus Partners
-
24.TRANSCORP INTERNATIONAL LTD
-
25.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD
-
26.VISA WORLDWIDE PTE LTD
Adv. SINHA APARAJITA P B,Rhea Fernandes
-
27.MASTER CARD ASIA PACIFIC PVT LTD
Adv. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co
-
28.NATIONAL PAYMENTS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD
Adv. The Law Point
-
29.CAPITAL PROTECTION FORCE PVT LTD
-
30.AJINKYA PATIL
-
31.DIPEN KUMAR GANDHI
-
32.ANIL SHENOY
Adv. KHAN NOORALAM
-
33.MAHADEVA NATEEKAR
-
34.RAVI BOTHERA
Adv. KHAN NOORALAM,KHAN NOORALAM
-
35.MOHANISH RAJINDER LAROIA
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the case to 10th June 2026 after hearing arguments on Defendant No. 1's Interim Application seeking arbitration referral under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Plaintiff objected, arguing the dispute is not arbitrable and other defendants are not parties to the arbitration agreement. The court directed Defendant No. 1 to serve the application on unserved parties, with replies due within four weeks and rejoinders within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COMS/45/2025
Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the case to 10th June 2026 after hearing arguments on Defendant No. 1's Interim Application seeking arbitration referral under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Plaintiff objected, arguing the dispute is not arbitrable and other defendants are not parties to the arbitration agreement. The court directed Defendant No. 1 to serve the application on unserved parties, with replies due within four weeks and rejoinders within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts