SUSHAMA ANIL DIKE vs PRACHI PRABHAKAR KULKARNI — TP/2334/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020116832026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/11683/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2334/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHAMA ANIL DIKE

    Adv. ANKIT B RATHOD

  2. 2.VIDYA PRAMOD KHANDEKAR

    Adv. ANKIT B RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRACHI PRABHAKAR KULKARNI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2334/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Sushama Anil Dike and Vidya Pramod Khandekar was called for direction on May 5, 2026. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai. The court will verify if cross-petitions exist and list the matter for final grant after all procedural compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2334/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2334/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Sushama Anil Dike and Vidya Pramod Khandekar was called for direction on May 5, 2026. The court directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai. The court will verify if cross-petitions exist and list the matter for final grant after all procedural compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case