Kala Daulat Mehta vs Union of India — WP/1878/2025

Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020116722025

e-Filing Number

09-04-2025

Filing Number

WP/11672/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP/1878/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kala Daulat Mehta

    Adv. Brijesh Pathak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India

  2. 2.Additional Director DGGI

    Adv. DAS SUMAN KUMAR

  3. 3.Additional Commissioner CGST

    Adv. DAS SUMAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jul-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

    SUMMARY: WP/1878/2025 – Kala Daulat Mehta v. Union of India Case Status: REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH – Petitions dismissed with questions of law reserved for larger bench consideration. Key Issue: Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act covering multiple financial years, or whether separate notices must be issued for each year. Outcome: The Division Bench (Kulkarni & Sathe, JJ.) found significant legal issues deserving larger bench consideration. The court noted conflicting decisions across high courts—Bombay (Milroc), Kerala, Madras, and Karnataka holding consolidated notices impermissible, while Delhi and Allahabad High Courts held them permissible. The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petition in Mathur Polymers (November 2025) added weight to the permissibility view. The court deferred final adjudication and referred five key constitutional/statutory questions to a larger bench, with all existing interim orders continuing pending the larger bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1878/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: WP/1878/2025 – Kala Daulat Mehta v. Union of India Case Status: REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH – Petitions dismissed with questions of law reserved for larger bench consideration. Key Issue: Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act covering multiple financial years, or whether separate notices must be issued for each year. Outcome: The Division Bench (Kulkarni & Sathe, JJ.) found significant legal issues deserving larger bench consideration. The court noted conflicting decisions across high courts—Bombay (Milroc), Kerala, Madras, and Karnataka holding consolidated notices impermissible, while Delhi and Allahabad High Courts held them permissible. The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Special Leave Petition in Mathur Polymers (November 2025) added weight to the permissibility view. The court deferred final adjudication and referred five key constitutional/statutory questions to a larger bench, with all existing interim orders continuing pending the larger bench decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case