GURUPRASAD CHIDAMBAR SHETTY vs DY CHIEF OFFICER (REPAIR AND RECONSRUCTION) — WP/2714/2026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020116602025

Filing Number

WP/11660/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP/2714/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURUPRASAD CHIDAMBAR SHETTY

    Adv. Puja Pilankar Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DY CHIEF OFFICER (REPAIR AND RECONSRUCTION)

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  3. 3.ESTATE MANAGER (CIRCLE-

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing MHADA (Respondent No.1) to review the petitioner's representation dated 31st January 2025 and communicate its decision to the petitioner within 6 weeks. The court did not render a substantive decision on the merits but instead directed the administrative authority to reconsider the petitioner's grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing MHADA (Respondent No.1) to review the petitioner's representation dated 31st January 2025 and communicate its decision to the petitioner within 6 weeks. The court did not render a substantive decision on the merits but instead directed the administrative authority to reconsider the petitioner's grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case