SANSKAR RAJESH DHOLAY vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANT GOVT OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM20116002026

Case under Maharashtra Education Institution Act Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020116002026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WP/11600/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Education Institution Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SANSKAR RAJESH DHOLAY

Adv. Chagan R Thakare

TWISA MAHENDRA DHOBLE

TEJAS MANIK GAVALI

AKHILESH BABAN DHENDE

ABHISHEK CHETAN RATHOD

TEJAS SANDIP PAWAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANT GOVT OF MAHARASHTRA

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

SARDAR PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

11-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Summary The Bombay High Court corrected paragraph 2 of its previous order dated 7 April 2026 in this writ petition. The correction clarified that Petitioner No.1 paid excess fees of Rs. 3,22,873 to the college under protest and on a without-prejudice basis, rather than simply stating fees were paid. The corrected order was accordingly confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court corrected paragraph 2 of its previous order dated 7 April 2026 in this writ petition. The correction clarified that Petitioner No.1 paid excess fees of Rs. 3,22,873 to the college under protest and on a without-prejudice basis, rather than simply stating fees were paid. The corrected order was accordingly confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case