SANSKAR RAJESH DHOLAY vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANT GOVT OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM20116002026

Case under Maharashtra Education Institution Act Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020116002026

Filing Number

WP/11600/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Education Institution Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANSKAR RAJESH DHOLAY

    Adv. Chagan R Thakare

  2. 2.TWISA MAHENDRA DHOBLE

  3. 3.TEJAS MANIK GAVALI

  4. 4.AKHILESH BABAN DHENDE

  5. 5.ABHISHEK CHETAN RATHOD

  6. 6.TEJAS SANDIP PAWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANT GOVT OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

  3. 3.THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

  4. 4.SARDAR PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court corrected paragraph 2 of its previous order dated 7 April 2026 in this writ petition. The correction clarified that Petitioner No.1 paid excess fees of Rs. 3,22,873 to the college under protest and on a without-prejudice basis, rather than simply stating fees were paid. The corrected order was accordingly confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court corrected paragraph 2 of its previous order dated 7 April 2026 in this writ petition. The correction clarified that Petitioner No.1 paid excess fees of Rs. 3,22,873 to the college under protest and on a without-prejudice basis, rather than simply stating fees were paid. The corrected order was accordingly confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case