INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED vs MR. SANTOSHKUMAR RAMSAJEEVAN DEWIVEDI AND ANR — EXA/853/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020115552014

Filing Number

EXA/908/2014

Filing Date

08-May-2014

Registration No

EXA/853/2015

Registration Date

23-Apr-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. DS Law

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. SANTOSHKUMAR RAMSAJEEVAN DEWIVEDI AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in Integro Finserv's execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution proceedings and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the limitation period from the original invocation date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 08-May-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/853/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in Integro Finserv's execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution proceedings and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the limitation period from the original invocation date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case