JETT 4 CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA (THRU. MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS) — HCBM20115442026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020115442026
Filing Number
WP/11544/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
Enforcement of Securities ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JETT 4 CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. RMG Law Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA (THRU. MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS)
-
2.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Adv. Intralegal
-
3.MARKAND ADHIKARI S/O LATE SH. NAVNITAL ADHIKARI
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Jett 4 Construction Private Limited (auction purchaser) and granted ad-interim stay of the DRT-I's status-quo order dated 17.02.2026. The court found that the respondent No.3's application was filed belatedly (February 2026) after the mortgagor had already failed to obtain interim relief since 2023, and directed that both related securitisation applications be consolidated and transferred to DRT-II for expedited hearing by 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Jett 4 Construction Private Limited (auction purchaser) and granted ad-interim stay of the DRT-I's status-quo order dated 17.02.2026. The court found that the respondent No.3's application was filed belatedly (February 2026) after the mortgagor had already failed to obtain interim relief since 2023, and directed that both related securitisation applications be consolidated and transferred to DRT-II for expedited hearing by 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts