SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE vs GANPAT BABAN WAPHARE — EXA/2141/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020115092025

Filing Number

EXA/11507/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

EXA/2141/2025

Registration Date

03-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANPAT BABAN WAPHARE

  2. 2.PRATIK GANPAT WAPHARE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including that in Sundaram Finance Limited v. Waphare) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period that elapsed during the invalid proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2141/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including that in Sundaram Finance Limited v. Waphare) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period that elapsed during the invalid proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case