ASPI BURJOR CHHAPGAR (THIR PARTY APPLICANT) vs ROSHAN VALIMOHAMMADE ANSARI — HCBM20115072026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020115072026
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
TPAC/11505/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASPI BURJOR CHHAPGAR (THIR PARTY APPLICANT)
Adv. MULLA AND MULLA AND CBC
Respondent(s)
ROSHAN VALIMOHAMMADE ANSARI
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary Outcome: Third Party Application ALLOWED. The court granted Aspi Burjor Chhapgar's (deceased's husband) request for a certified copy of all records and proceedings from Testamentary Petition No. 1139 of 2025. Chhapgar contested the validity of a Will allegedly executed by his deceased wife on 05.04.2016, claiming the Will is forged, the signature is not genuine, he never signed any consent affidavit, and no citation was served to him. The court found sufficient cause for the issuance, directing the office to provide the certified copy expeditiously upon payment of charges, with the restriction that it be used only for recalling the granted Probate and not shared with third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Outcome: Third Party Application ALLOWED. The court granted Aspi Burjor Chhapgar's (deceased's husband) request for a certified copy of all records and proceedings from Testamentary Petition No. 1139 of 2025. Chhapgar contested the validity of a Will allegedly executed by his deceased wife on 05.04.2016, claiming the Will is forged, the signature is not genuine, he never signed any consent affidavit, and no citation was served to him. The court found sufficient cause for the issuance, directing the office to provide the certified copy expeditiously upon payment of charges, with the restriction that it be used only for recalling the granted Probate and not shared with third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts