DINANATH CHAUGANI CHATURVEDI vs DEVESH DINANATH CHATURVEDI — S/232/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020114852025

Filing Number

S/11483/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

S/232/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

FOR DECLARATION BASED ON DOCUMENTS ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINANATH CHAUGANI CHATURVEDI

    Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVESH DINANATH CHATURVEDI

  2. 2.RAJESH DINANATH CHATURVEDI

    Adv. Vishal Shriyan

  3. 3.BRIJESH DEVESH CHATURVEDI

  4. 4.KAUSHAL S. SHAH

  5. 5.THE JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR MUMBAI CITY IV

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Case Summary: Suit S/232/2025 has been abated due to the plaintiff's death on 26.10.2025. Although defendants 2-4 were validly served with the Writ of Summons before the plaintiff's demise, no steps have been taken by the plaintiff's counsel to bring legal heirs on record despite seeking time. The matter is adjourned to the Hon'ble Court under O.S. Rule 132 IX-A for appropriate directions, with the office directed to follow up. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/232/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Suit S/232/2025 has been abated due to the plaintiff's death on 26.10.2025. Although defendants 2-4 were validly served with the Writ of Summons before the plaintiff's demise, no steps have been taken by the plaintiff's counsel to bring legal heirs on record despite seeking time. The matter is adjourned to the Hon'ble Court under O.S. Rule 132 IX-A for appropriate directions, with the office directed to follow up. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case