Earthen Roots Pvt Ltd YNA LEGAL LLP vs Vedant Innotech Pvt Ltd — CARBP/421/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020114682026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/11466/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
CARBP/421/2026
Registration Date
22-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Interim Relief ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Earthen Roots Pvt Ltd YNA LEGAL LLP
Respondent(s)
Vedant Innotech Pvt Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 27-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court converted Earthen Roots Pvt Ltd's Section 9 petition into a Section 17 application and referred the dispute with Vedant Innotech Pvt Ltd—arising from an October 2024 Authorized Agency Agreement—to arbitration with the consent of both parties. The court appointed Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, a former judge, as sole arbitrator, with arbitral costs to be shared equally and subject to the final award. All substantive issues remain open for the arbitral tribunal to decide on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court converted Earthen Roots Pvt Ltd's Section 9 petition into a Section 17 application and referred the dispute with Vedant Innotech Pvt Ltd—arising from an October 2024 Authorized Agency Agreement—to arbitration with the consent of both parties. The court appointed Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, a former judge, as sole arbitrator, with arbitral costs to be shared equally and subject to the final award. All substantive issues remain open for the arbitral tribunal to decide on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts