Aditya Birla Capital Limited Tikshta Modi vs Fortune Enterprises — EXA/2268/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020114662025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

09-04-2025

Filing Number

EXA/11464/2025

Filing Date

09-04-2025

Registration No

EXA/2268/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

Aditya Birla Capital Limited Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

Fortune Enterprises

K R MADHANMOHAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

08-06-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, found void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. Execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, but parties may initiate fresh arbitration with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless a written waiver agreement exists under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, found void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. Execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, but parties may initiate fresh arbitration with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless a written waiver agreement exists under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case