L AND T FINANCE LTD. vs MAYA MAHADEV AND ANOTHER — EXA/2302/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020114652015

Filing Number

EXA/929/2015

Filing Date

21-Apr-2015

Registration No

EXA/2302/2015

Registration Date

28-Oct-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAYA MAHADEV AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.BABU RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2302/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L & T Finance Ltd.'s execution application against Maya Mahadev and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior limitation period from the time of the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 21-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2302/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2302/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L & T Finance Ltd.'s execution application against Maya Mahadev and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior limitation period from the time of the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case