Sadhna Narayan Patil vs Narayan Kashinath Patil — TP/2289/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020113872026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/11385/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2289/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sadhna Narayan Patil

    Adv. SANGEETA SALVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Kashinath Patil

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2289/2026 The petition filed by Sadhna Narayan Patil (a testamentary matter) has been admitted for hearing. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, submit Schedule-I copies to the Collector, and identify non-consenting legal heirs. The petitioner must comply with Chapter XXVI of the BHC Rules, including furnishing an administration bond for the gross amount and explaining any delay. The case is adjourned to 18.08.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2289/2026 The petition filed by Sadhna Narayan Patil (a testamentary matter) has been admitted for hearing. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, submit Schedule-I copies to the Collector, and identify non-consenting legal heirs. The petitioner must comply with Chapter XXVI of the BHC Rules, including furnishing an administration bond for the gross amount and explaining any delay. The case is adjourned to 18.08.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case