Abhijit Vinod Kothari vs Arati Vinod Kothari — TP/2030/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020113292026

e-Filing Number

27-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/11328/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2030/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abhijit Vinod Kothari

    Adv. Rahul Bothra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arati Vinod Kothari

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2030/2026 Summary: The case was called for direction on 23rd April 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed procedural compliance: the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and to verify if any cross petition exists. The matter was adjourned pending completion of these formalities, with liberty to relist for final grant once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2030/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2030/2026 Summary: The case was called for direction on 23rd April 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed procedural compliance: the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and to verify if any cross petition exists. The matter was adjourned pending completion of these formalities, with liberty to relist for final grant once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case