SUDHAKAR SURYABALI PATHAK vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH. GOVERNMENT PLEADER — WP/2277/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020113102026

Filing Number

WP/11309/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2277/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHAKAR SURYABALI PATHAK

    Adv. Angad Giri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.THE APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

  3. 3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRA

  4. 4.KISHOR B. LAD (CHAIRMAN)

  5. 5.PONOM DEVELOPERS LLP TH. ITS PARTNER

    Adv. Vijay Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition while noting that an appeal before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) has been pending since 2020. The court directed the AGRC to dispose of the appeal within 8 weeks, leaving the issue of consequences regarding the petitioner's failure to comply with AGRC's directive to add Respondent No.5 as a party for the AGRC to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition while noting that an appeal before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) has been pending since 2020. The court directed the AGRC to dispose of the appeal within 8 weeks, leaving the issue of consequences regarding the petitioner's failure to comply with AGRC's directive to add Respondent No.5 as a party for the AGRC to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case