Rashmi Dilip Lukka vs Dilip Dayalji Lukka — TP/2203/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.

Next hearing 06-Aug-2026

CNR: HCBM020111502026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/11150/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2203/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rashmi Dilip Lukka

    Adv. RAKSHA TANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Dayalji Lukka

Case History

  1. 06-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Aug-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2203/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Rashmi Dilip Lukka against Dilip Dayalji Lukka was adjourned with directions. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 by submitting Schedule-I to the Collector, serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs, furnish an administration bond per Rule 420, and ensure all Chapter XXVI BHC Rules requirements are met. The case is scheduled for further hearing on 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2203/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Rashmi Dilip Lukka against Dilip Dayalji Lukka was adjourned with directions. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 by submitting Schedule-I to the Collector, serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs, furnish an administration bond per Rule 420, and ensure all Chapter XXVI BHC Rules requirements are met. The case is scheduled for further hearing on 06.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case