NITIN LAXMIDAS DAMA vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT — HCBM20110532026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020110532026

Filing Number

WP/11053/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN LAXMIDAS DAMA

    Adv. SAPNA SHANKAR KRISHNAPPA

  2. 2.RAJESHWAR PRASAD DAYA NARAYAN SINGH

  3. 3.RAM BANARAS BUDHIRAM

  4. 4.SANTOSH MARUTI TAMBE

  5. 5.MANJULA DEVCHAND GALA

  6. 6.VIRABHAI CHELABHAI PATEL

  7. 7.VISHESHWAR SINGH

  8. 8.ASHAPURA SAHAKARI GRIHA NIRMAN SANSTHA MARYADIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT

  2. 2.THE DESIGNATED OFFICER AND ASSISTANT ENGINEER

  3. 3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  4. 4.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    Summary: The writ petition was allowed. The High Court of Bombay quashed the March 6, 2026 order by MHADA directing demolition of unauthorized constructions at commercial shops occupied by petitioners for 50-60 years. The court directed the appropriate authority to decide within four weeks whether the constructions can be compounded/regularized under the MRTP Act, considering the petitioners' long-term occupancy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  10. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  12. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The writ petition was allowed. The High Court of Bombay quashed the March 6, 2026 order by MHADA directing demolition of unauthorized constructions at commercial shops occupied by petitioners for 50-60 years. The court directed the appropriate authority to decide within four weeks whether the constructions can be compounded/regularized under the MRTP Act, considering the petitioners' long-term occupancy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case