NIRAJ CHITNIS vs THE OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - B L A C Co — HCBM20110212025
Case under Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020110212025
Filing Number
WP/11021/2025
Filing Date
05-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
BANK OTHERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRAJ CHITNIS
Adv. Keystone Partners
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - B L A C Co
-
2.AXIS BANK LIMITED
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary: NIRAJ CHITNIS v. THE OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & AXIS BANK LIMITED Outcome: Multiple writ petitions (64 cases listed) were given a final opportunity to cure procedural defects. Petitioners must remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. Case adjourned conditionally pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
19-May-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
15-May-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
06-May-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
17-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale,hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2025
Case filed
Case Summary: NIRAJ CHITNIS v. THE OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & AXIS BANK LIMITED Outcome: Multiple writ petitions (64 cases listed) were given a final opportunity to cure procedural defects. Petitioners must remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. Case adjourned conditionally pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts