MAHENDRA REALTORS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM NIKHIL VIJAY ADKINE vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — HCBM20109702025
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020109702025
Filing Number
WP/10970/2025
Filing Date
05-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHENDRA REALTORS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM NIKHIL VIJAY ADKINE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Adv. GP OS
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jul-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court, in its order dated May 6, 2026, gave petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in 64 writ petitions (including Mahendra Realtors' petition against MCGM and Maharashtra). Petitioners must file compliance within four weeks; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court, in its order dated May 6, 2026, gave petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in 64 writ petitions (including Mahendra Realtors' petition against MCGM and Maharashtra). Petitioners must file compliance within four weeks; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts