KANHAIYALAL MANMOHANRAJ JOSHI vs THE CHIEF OFFICER MUMBAI BUILDING AND REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, MHADA — WP/2252/2026
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020108512026
Filing Number
WP/10851/2026
Filing Date
25-03-2026
Registration No
WP/2252/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
MHADA ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANHAIYALAL MANMOHANRAJ JOSHI
Adv. ABHIJEET P RANE
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF OFFICER MUMBAI BUILDING AND REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, MHADA
SWAPNIL KOTE
SARVESH ENTERPRISES
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA BY THE GOV. PLEADER OS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw Writ Petition No. 10851 of 2026 with liberty to file a fresh petition. The withdrawal was granted because the petitioner's counsel had inadvertently failed to annex a critical order dated 31st January, 2025 from a related writ petition, which was essential for adjudicating the present relief claims. The court made no observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw Writ Petition No. 10851 of 2026 with liberty to file a fresh petition. The withdrawal was granted because the petitioner's counsel had inadvertently failed to annex a critical order dated 31st January, 2025 from a related writ petition, which was essential for adjudicating the present relief claims. The court made no observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts