KANHAIYALAL MANMOHANRAJ JOSHI vs THE CHIEF OFFICER MUMBAI BUILDING AND REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, MHADA — WP/2252/2026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020108512026

Filing Number

WP/10851/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2252/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANHAIYALAL MANMOHANRAJ JOSHI

    Adv. ABHIJEET P RANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF OFFICER MUMBAI BUILDING AND REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, MHADA

  2. 2.SWAPNIL KOTE

  3. 3.SARVESH ENTERPRISES

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA BY THE GOV. PLEADER OS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw Writ Petition No. 10851 of 2026 with liberty to file a fresh petition. The withdrawal was granted because the petitioner's counsel had inadvertently failed to annex a critical order dated 31st January, 2025 from a related writ petition, which was essential for adjudicating the present relief claims. The court made no observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw Writ Petition No. 10851 of 2026 with liberty to file a fresh petition. The withdrawal was granted because the petitioner's counsel had inadvertently failed to annex a critical order dated 31st January, 2025 from a related writ petition, which was essential for adjudicating the present relief claims. The court made no observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case