ROHAN CONSTRUCTINS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NAMELY VIJAY DEVRAM VARADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY — HCBM20107572025
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020107572025
Filing Number
WP/10757/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT ( 50 )
Sub-Category
Housing Area Development ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHAN CONSTRUCTINS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NAMELY VIJAY DEVRAM VARADE
Adv. Ashish Suresh Vernekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
-
2.THE CHIEF OFFICER
-
3.THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER D-3 DIVISION (MBR AND R) BOARD
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (MBR AND R) BOARD
-
5.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI TH. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
-
6.MOHAMMAD AZAM ANIS AHMED SHEIKH
-
7.LILABHEN M. BAIRAI
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
This document does not contain a case decision regarding Rohan Constructions. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court dated 6 May 2026 addressing multiple unregistered petitions (WPL cases from 2025). The court gave petitioners a final opportunity of four weeks to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance documents, with a warning that petitions would be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986 if this deadline is not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
This document does not contain a case decision regarding Rohan Constructions. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court dated 6 May 2026 addressing multiple unregistered petitions (WPL cases from 2025). The court gave petitioners a final opportunity of four weeks to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance documents, with a warning that petitions would be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986 if this deadline is not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts