RASHMEE ATUL AMERSEY WIFE OF SHRI ATUL NANALAL AMERSEY BHARTI A DESAI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGH THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT — HCBM20107072025

Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section 1. Next hearing: 29th July 2025.

Next hearing 29-Jul-2025

CNR: HCBM020107072025

Filing Number

IA/10707/2025

Filing Date

03-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHMEE ATUL AMERSEY WIFE OF SHRI ATUL NANALAL AMERSEY BHARTI A DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGH THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT

  2. 2.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR

  3. 3.SUB-REGISTRAR OF ASSURANCES MUMBAI -

  4. 4.THE SECRETARY CHAIRMAN RAGHAVJI BUILDING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD

  5. 5.SUPERINTENDENT CITY SURVEY AND LAND RECORD MUMBAI CITY (PROPOSED RESP.)

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on 06 May 2026 regarding multiple consolidated writ petitions. As a final opportunity, petitioners were directed to remove office objections and register/number their petitions by filing compliance within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. The same directive applied to pending interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jul-2025

    For Amendment

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  4. 23-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on 06 May 2026 regarding multiple consolidated writ petitions. As a final opportunity, petitioners were directed to remove office objections and register/number their petitions by filing compliance within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. The same directive applied to pending interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case