MEHUL VISHANJI GALA vs DIVYA JYOT PROJECTS LLP — HCBM20106952026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020106952026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/10695/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHUL VISHANJI GALA

    Adv. UTTAM S RANE

  2. 2.KUNJAL MEHUL GALA

    Adv. UTTAM S RANE

  3. 3.NIRAV VISHANJI GALA

    Adv. UTTAM S RANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVYA JYOT PROJECTS LLP

  2. 2.PURUSHOTTAM PITUMAL TEJWANI

    Adv. SL Partners

  3. 3.VINAYA PURUSHOTTAM TEJWANI

    Adv. SL Partners

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay adjourned two consolidated commercial arbitration petitions to June 24, 2026 by consent. The court granted parties liberty to make further applications before the Arbitral Tribunal regarding interlocutory arrangements for economic utilization of property units, while deferring substantive arguments on all grievances to the next hearing due to time constraints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay adjourned two consolidated commercial arbitration petitions to June 24, 2026 by consent. The court granted parties liberty to make further applications before the Arbitral Tribunal regarding interlocutory arrangements for economic utilization of property units, while deferring substantive arguments on all grievances to the next hearing due to time constraints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case