AXIS BANK(FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD.) vs DURGAPRASAD PANDEY — EXA/2394/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020106132022

Filing Number

EXA/10611/2022

Filing Date

01-Apr-2022

Registration No

EXA/2394/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK(FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD.)

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DURGAPRASAD PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2394/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (serial nos. 902-1148) on the ground that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, which was found void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Airports Authority of India*. All connected execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 24-Nov-2022

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla

  6. 13-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2394/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2394/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (serial nos. 902-1148) on the ground that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, which was found void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Airports Authority of India*. All connected execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case