DURGA VINAYAK TENDULKAR vs SHRIRAM PURUSHOTTAM TENDULKAR DECASED — TP/2550/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020106102026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/10609/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2550/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURGA VINAYAK TENDULKAR

    Adv. Siddhi Pravin Chavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM PURUSHOTTAM TENDULKAR DECASED

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2550/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Durga Vinayak Tendulkar was called for directions on 8th June 2026. The court adjourned the matter and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, while the advocate must serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The court further directed verification of any cross-petitions and granted liberty to relist after compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2550/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2550/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Durga Vinayak Tendulkar was called for directions on 8th June 2026. The court adjourned the matter and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, while the advocate must serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The court further directed verification of any cross-petitions and granted liberty to relist after compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case