Gandhi Usha Ramesh vs Rasik Narsinghdas Sonpal Alias Rasiklal Sonpal — TP/2025/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020105942026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/10593/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2025/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gandhi Usha Ramesh

    Adv. Ajit S Hodage

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rasik Narsinghdas Sonpal Alias Rasiklal Sonpal

  2. 2.Pushpaben R Sonpal Alias Pushpa Sonpal, wife of Rasik Sonpal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2025/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Gandhi Usha Ramesh was called for directions on 23rd April 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, and furnish an Administration Bond as per prescribed rules. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after compliance and readiness for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2025/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2025/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Gandhi Usha Ramesh was called for directions on 23rd April 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, and furnish an Administration Bond as per prescribed rules. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after compliance and readiness for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case