Rashmi Surendra Sura vs Surendra Mohanlal Sura DECEASED — TP/2496/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020105742026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/10573/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2496/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rashmi Surendra Sura

    Adv. Tripty M. Kapadia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Surendra Mohanlal Sura DECEASED

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2496/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th May 2026 before the Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased, and required the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court rules. The case was adjourned pending completion of compliance procedures, with liberty to move for final listing once all requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2496/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2496/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th May 2026 before the Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased, and required the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court rules. The case was adjourned pending completion of compliance procedures, with liberty to move for final listing once all requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case