PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI vs Manoj Kumar Agarwal — HCBM20104802025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020104802025

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

ITXA/10480/2025

Filing Date

01-Apr-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI

    Adv. Abhishek R Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Kumar Agarwal

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    This court order does not pertain to the case described in your prompt (PR Commissioner of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Manoj Kumar Agarwal). The document is a general administrative order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026, addressing multiple income tax appeals (numbered 138-188) marked "FOR REJECTION." The order grants appellants a final two-week opportunity to cure office objections and register their appeals, or face automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. It does not involve the specific petitioner-respondent pair mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 01-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This court order does not pertain to the case described in your prompt (PR Commissioner of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Manoj Kumar Agarwal). The document is a general administrative order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026, addressing multiple income tax appeals (numbered 138-188) marked "FOR REJECTION." The order grants appellants a final two-week opportunity to cure office objections and register their appeals, or face automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. It does not involve the specific petitioner-respondent pair mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case