PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI vs Manoj Kumar Agarwal — HCBM20104802025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020104802025

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

ITXA/10480/2025

Filing Date

01-04-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI

Adv. Abhishek R Mishra

Respondent(s)

Manoj Kumar Agarwal

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

09-06-2026

FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986

Orders

09-06-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

This court order does not pertain to the case described in your prompt (PR Commissioner of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Manoj Kumar Agarwal). The document is a general administrative order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026, addressing multiple income tax appeals (numbered 138-188) marked "FOR REJECTION." The order grants appellants a final two-week opportunity to cure office objections and register their appeals, or face automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. It does not involve the specific petitioner-respondent pair mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This court order does not pertain to the case described in your prompt (PR Commissioner of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Manoj Kumar Agarwal). The document is a general administrative order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026, addressing multiple income tax appeals (numbered 138-188) marked "FOR REJECTION." The order grants appellants a final two-week opportunity to cure office objections and register their appeals, or face automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. It does not involve the specific petitioner-respondent pair mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case