Ashok Tejumal Thakur vs Tejumal Bhagwandas Thakur — TP/4137/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020104762025
e-Filing Number
30-03-2025
Filing Number
TP/10476/2025
Filing Date
01-Apr-2025
Registration No
TP/4137/2025
Registration Date
11-Aug-2025
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashok Tejumal Thakur
Adv. ARVIND F MANGHIRMALANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tejumal Bhagwandas Thakur
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/4137/2025 In this testamentary petition before the Bombay High Court, the Court allowed the petitioner's application for amendment to the petition as per the draft submitted. The petitioner's advocate was granted eight weeks from the order date (16.06.2026) to carry out the amendments and re-upload the amended petition on the official court portal. The matter was mentioned but not taken up for substantive hearing on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
01-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TP/4137/2025
Case Summary: TP/4137/2025 In this testamentary petition before the Bombay High Court, the Court allowed the petitioner's application for amendment to the petition as per the draft submitted. The petitioner's advocate was granted eight weeks from the order date (16.06.2026) to carry out the amendments and re-upload the amended petition on the official court portal. The matter was mentioned but not taken up for substantive hearing on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts