Ashaben Purshottamadas Rupareliya vs Purshottam Nandlal Ruparelia alias Purshottam Nandlal Rupareila alias Purshottamadas Rupareliya — TP/2041/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020104322026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/10432/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

TP/2041/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Ashaben Purshottamadas Rupareliya

Adv. SEEMA HUNNURKAR

Respondent(s)

Purshottam Nandlal Ruparelia alias Purshottam Nandlal Rupareila alias Purshottamadas Rupareliya

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

23-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

23-04-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case TP/2041/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 23 April 2026 and directed the court office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per procedural rules, furnish an administration bond, and verify if cross-petitions exist. The case is adjourned pending completion of these compliance requirements, with liberty to relist for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2041/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 23 April 2026 and directed the court office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per procedural rules, furnish an administration bond, and verify if cross-petitions exist. The case is adjourned pending completion of these compliance requirements, with liberty to relist for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case