Ashaben Purshottamadas Rupareliya vs Purshottam Nandlal Ruparelia alias Purshottam Nandlal Rupareila alias Purshottamadas Rupareliya — TP/2041/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020104322026
e-Filing Number
20-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/10432/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
TP/2041/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashaben Purshottamadas Rupareliya
Adv. SEEMA HUNNURKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Purshottam Nandlal Ruparelia alias Purshottam Nandlal Rupareila alias Purshottamadas Rupareliya
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case TP/2041/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 23 April 2026 and directed the court office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per procedural rules, furnish an administration bond, and verify if cross-petitions exist. The case is adjourned pending completion of these compliance requirements, with liberty to relist for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2041/2026
Case TP/2041/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 23 April 2026 and directed the court office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per procedural rules, furnish an administration bond, and verify if cross-petitions exist. The case is adjourned pending completion of these compliance requirements, with liberty to relist for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts