Amit Narenrda Tyagi alias Amit Narendra Tyagi vs Late Sukeshi Dilipkumar Thakkar — TP/2115/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
CNR: HCBM020104312026
e-Filing Number
19-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/10431/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
TP/2115/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Coram
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration with Will ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amit Narenrda Tyagi alias Amit Narendra Tyagi
Adv. PRANALI MISAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Late Sukeshi Dilipkumar Thakkar
Case History
-
03-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Aug-2026
For Compliance
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
04-May-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
Case Summary: TP/2115/2026 Amit Narendra Tyagi's testamentary petition as a beneficiary under the deceased's will was admitted for direction. The court directed the petitioner to issue citations to non-consenting legal heirs and legatees within three weeks, file an affidavit of service within two weeks, and furnish an Administration Bond within three weeks per prescribed forms and rules. The petitioner must also provide a list of non-consenting legatees, comply with inventory and documentation requirements under the Bombay High Court Rules, and the office must verify no caveats or cross-petitions are pending. Case adjourned to 03.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2115/2026
Case Summary: TP/2115/2026 Amit Narendra Tyagi's testamentary petition as a beneficiary under the deceased's will was admitted for direction. The court directed the petitioner to issue citations to non-consenting legal heirs and legatees within three weeks, file an affidavit of service within two weeks, and furnish an Administration Bond within three weeks per prescribed forms and rules. The petitioner must also provide a list of non-consenting legatees, comply with inventory and documentation requirements under the Bombay High Court Rules, and the office must verify no caveats or cross-petitions are pending. Case adjourned to 03.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts